Chattanooga, TN (USA)

• Kidnapping/cartel-extortion risk specifically targeting foreigners
  N/A
  This mechanism (as distinct from organized social backlash, which Rincón's file does document) doesn't apply the same way it does at every other candidate in this project — a US citizen relocating domestically isn't a foreign national in a local market. Stated explicitly as N/A rather than left silent
• Distance to emergency care
  Not yet researched
  Same gap as Asheville's — no ER-distance/hospital-access fact found in Chattanooga's own files this pass
• Pet import (dog/cat) — rules and process
  Not yet researched
  Same reasoning as Asheville's row

How you'd actually get to stay — the real routes, their income floors, and how long they realistically take, not the marketing version.

• "Border run" practice status
  Not tolerated — a visible pattern is itself a risk trigger
  Named explicitly as this project's "notably stricter than most candidates" case: no CA-4-style shared clock or tolerated workaround exists; CBP officers can deny re-entry or shorten admission on suspicion of a repeat short-exit pattern
• Closing costs
  1–6 % of purchase price
  Lowest closing-cost range of any candidate in this project
• Digital-nomad/rentista-style visa category exists (Framing B)
  No
  The headline Framing-B finding, unchanged: unlike Guatemala, Colombia, Argentina, Portugal, Greece, and Mexico — each of which has some passive-income/remote-work category — the US has never created one. The flip side, now developed: most real routes that do exist convert directly to permanent residency, unlike a renewable-forever nomad visa
• Diversity Visa (DV) lottery
  ~55,000 green cards/year, random lottery, excludes high-volume source countries
  Named for completeness, not developed as a plannable route; whether this project's own candidate countries are excluded by recent admission volumes was not checked country-by-country — a real, named gap
• E-2 Treaty Investor — nationality-restricted (treaty country required)
  Yes (~80 treaty countries only)
  The applicant's own nationality, not residence, gates eligibility entirely — a structural cap the EB-5/NIW/EB-1A routes don't share
• E-2 Treaty Investor — qualifying investment threshold
  ~50000–300000 USD
  No fixed statutory minimum — a "substantial," at-risk investment scaled to the business. Genuinely the lower-capital investor option this pass was asked to find, well below EB-5's floor
• E-2 Treaty Investor converts to permanent residency
  No
  Renewable indefinitely as a non-immigrant status but does not itself lead to a green card — the honest catch behind the lower capital bar; a green card requires separately qualifying under EB-5, EB-1C, or another category
• EB-1A Extraordinary Ability — self-petition, no employer/PERM required
  Yes (self-petition)
  Requires sustained national/international acclaim (3 of 10 evidentiary criteria); converts directly to a green card, same immigrant-category shape as NIW but a materially higher evidentiary bar — "very top of the field," not just a strong professional record
• EB-2 India — final action date backlog
  ~2012 (≈14-year wait) priority-date year
  The single most easily-overlooked fact in this whole section: identical category, identical filing date, wildly different outcome by country of birth (not citizenship or residence)
• EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW) — self-petition, no employer/PERM required
  Yes (self-petition)
  Requires advanced degree or exceptional ability, plus the Dhanasar 3-prong national-interest test; converts directly to a green card (this IS the immigrant category, not a temporary status). Best fit for a professional/research-track-record profile, a weak fit for pure passive/rental income with no distinguishing achievement
• EB-2 NIW — I-140 premium processing fee (2026)
  2965 USD
  Effective March 1, 2026; buys a 45-business-day USCIS adjudication commitment. Standard processing ran 2.5-26.5 months for 80% of cases as of June 2026
• EB-2/EB-3 backlog — rest of world (most nationalities, including this project's own candidate countries)
  Close to current
  The large majority of the world's nationalities, including Guatemalan-, Colombian-, Moroccan-, and Thai-born applicants, face no comparable structural wait — a real, material "which passport" fact
• EB-3 India — final action date backlog
  ~2012–2013 priority-date year
  Same per-country-cap mechanism as EB-2 India above
• EB-5 Investor Visa — qualifying investment threshold
  800000–1050000 USD
  $800k in a Targeted Employment Area (rural/high-unemployment) or qualifying infrastructure project, $1.05M elsewhere; USCIS states these hold through FY2026, inflation-indexed increase expected from January 2027 (trajectory qualifier: stable through FY2026 specifically)
• EB-5 Investor Visa accepts passive income as qualifying proof
  No
  An asset/capital-investment test, not an income test — same shape as Guatemala's Investor Visa row
• EB-5 Investor Visa converts to permanent residency
  Yes (conditional, then unconditional)
  2-year conditional green card first, I-829 petition to remove conditions once the 10-job requirement is proven, then unconditional; citizenship-eligible after 5 years total residency
• Family sponsorship — F1 preference (unmarried adult child of a citizen) backlog
  ~9 (most countries), ~19 (Mexico) years
  Real, converts directly to permanent residency, but genuinely too slow to plan a move around for most applicants
• Family sponsorship — F3 preference (married child of a citizen) backlog
  ~14–17 (most), ~19–25 (Mexico/Philippines) years
  A Filipino family that filed in 2005 only saw its priority date become current in April 2026 — a real 21-year worked example, not a projection
• Family sponsorship — immediate relative of a US citizen (spouse/parent/minor child)
  No cap, no backlog (~12-24 months all-in)
  Genuinely one of the fastest, least-capital routes in the entire system — requires an actual qualifying relationship, not creatable on demand
• Foreign land-ownership restriction by nationality (state-level)
  Yes (~36 states, ~7 named "countries of concern")
  China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Syria recur across enacted state laws; mostly scoped to agricultural land, critical-infrastructure proximity, or land near military bases, not a blanket ban — narrower than Guatemala's/Mexico's restricted zones but real and nationality-dependent, a fact Framing A's "no restriction at all" summary couldn't surface
• H-1B — supplemental fee for consular-processing petitions
  100000 USD
  Applies only when the beneficiary is outside the US at filing; change-of-status filings from inside the US (e.g. F-1 to H-1B) are exempt — an easily-missed distinction
• H-1B converts to permanent residency
  Yes (indirectly, via EB-2/EB-3 sponsorship)
  H-1B is a dual-intent visa — pursuing a green card doesn't jeopardize the underlying status, unlike a B-visa
• H-1B employer-sponsored visa — lottery selection odds (FY2027)
  15–46 % (by wage level)
  New wage-weighted lottery: ~15% at entry-level (Level I) wage up to ~46%+ at the top (Level IV) tier — not a single flat probability. Requires an actual US employer/specialty-occupation job offer, not a fit for remote/passive income alone
• International Entrepreneur Rule — status type and duration
  Parole (not a visa), up to 2.5 years, renewable once to 5-year max
  Discretionary, revocable, no formal immigration status; a new $1,000 parole fee applies as of October 16, 2025
• International Entrepreneur Rule converts to permanent residency
  No
  The lowest personal-capital bar of any route in this file, and the most fragile — parole recipients generally must separately qualify under another category, sometimes after leaving the US, to ever adjust to permanent residency
• International Entrepreneur Rule (IER) — qualifying startup investment
  311071 (investors) or 124429 (govt grants) USD
  No personal-investment minimum — the startup itself must meet this bar. Largest update since the program's 2017 launch
• L-1A intracompany transferee → EB-1C — converts to permanent residency
  Yes (directly, no PERM)
  Typical timeline 3-5 years for most nationalities, among the faster employment-based routes — but only usable by someone who already owns/executively runs a genuine, operating foreign company capable of a real US affiliate; not a route buildable from scratch
• O-1 dual-intent status
  Not yet checked
  O-1 is a real non-immigrant bridge to EB-1A/NIW in practice but requires an employer/agent sponsor unlike the two self-petition routes above; whether it permits dual intent without jeopardizing status was not confirmed
• Standard EB-2/EB-3 (PERM, employer-sponsored) converts to permanent residency
  Yes (directly)
  Immigrant category by construction — the per-country backlog below is a wait for an already-guaranteed outcome, not a risk of denial
• Tourist/visitor overstay consequences
  180d-1yr: 3-year bar; 1yr+: 10-year bar; VWP overstay: possible permanent VWP ineligibility + no right to contest removal before a judge
  VWP overstay carries a harsher structural consequence than a B-visa overstay — a real asymmetry between the two visitor tracks
• Tourist/visitor stay length — B-1/B-2 (non-VWP nationalities, the majority of the world)
  Up to 180 days per entry
  Covers most nationalities, including every one of this project's own candidate countries; visa document itself often valid up to 10 years multiple-entry, but each admitted stay is set by the CBP officer at entry, typically up to 6 months
• Tourist/visitor stay length — VWP/ESTA (42 countries)
  90 days
  Automatic on arrival via ESTA, no consular interview, for ~42 countries (most of Western Europe, UK, Japan, South Korea, Australia, NZ, Chile, Singapore, Taiwan, Israel, others)
• Tourist/visitor time counts toward anything longer-term
  No
  Sharper than the standard "doesn't count" default found elsewhere: nonimmigrant intent is an active, sworn requirement, so filing for a green card too soon after a tourist entry can itself be read as evidence of misrepresented intent at entry — a fraud-adjacent risk, not just a wasted clock
• Tourist/visitor visa extensions
  VWP: none (narrow 30-day medical exception only); B-2: one, up to +6 months
  B-2 extension filed via Form I-539, 45+ days before expiry, discretionary, requires a legitimate reason; no second extension except extraordinary circumstances
• No state income tax (Tennessee)
  Yes (0%)
  Vs. North Carolina's flat 3.99% (Asheville) — a genuine, structural cost-of-living difference

Can you buy here, and what it actually takes to do it — ownership rules, structures, and real price bands, not listing-site optimism.

• ADU/compound-model zoning (Hamilton County)
  No (mirrors city cap)
  Confirmed no looser county-level option, unlike Buncombe County's real exception — the documented reason Chattanooga's score sits below Asheville's
• Sub-$150k standalone-house inventory
  Yes
  165+ listings citywide under $150k, including a real 3BR/1BA bungalow at $69,900 — the closest realistic in-budget match found anywhere in USA's research; caveat: correlates specifically with a historically disinvested neighborhood, not a like-for-like discount
• Median home price
  259200–399643 $
  Genuinely below Asheville's range at either end of either city's own spread

What a month here actually runs, in real numbers — not a nomad-blog average built for a lifestyle that isn't yours.

• Chattanooga-specific ACA marketplace premium
  Not yet researched
  Same national-figure-only gap as Asheville
• Overall average rent (all unit types)
  1464 $/month
  13% below the US national average overall; housing specifically 23% below
• Rent — 1BR
  1153–1688 $/month
  Numbeo and Expatistan genuinely agree once compared like-for-like (~4% apart on an all-in basis)

Who else lives here, how you'd actually meet them, and what it's like once the novelty wears off.

• Established remote-worker/nomad population (headcount)
  Not yet researched
  Chattanooga's own community-network.md wasn't checked for a countable-population figure this pass
• Political/social-climate research
  Not yet researched
  Same gap as Asheville's

• Source noted — no link available yet 2026-07-11
• Source noted — no link available yet 2026-07-08
• Source noted — no link available yet Not stated
• Source noted — no link available yet 2026-07-08
• Source noted — no link available yet 2026-07-08
• Source noted — no link available yet 2026-07-07